www.charlescrawford.biz     mail@charlescrawford.biz
Charles Crawford
Search charlescrawford.biz
Google


charlescrawford.biz
www
Blog categories

The iPhone: A Model For Social Transformation?

28th September 2009

Guido lauds the Spectator as the first UK current affairs magazine with an iPhone app:

This is the future of journalism, the sooner the mediasaurs grasp this truth the more likely they are to survive into the future. 

I checked out the iTunes link and the only review of the App says that it is terrible: clunky and dysfunctional. So it does not get my money (yet).

Update: not clear that this is an official Speccie product.

Whatever.

Let's take a wider look at the iPhone App phenomenon.

There are now tens of thousands of iPhone Apps created by people all round the world jostling for our attention, a superb example of focused but differentiated networked teamwork. Two billion downloads have happened.

What is going on here?

Basically, thanks to setting up a robust popular IT platform based on what millions of people want (namely music), Apple have worked out how to deliver reliable downloads on a mass scale. It delivers really fast, simply and well. And it looks nice.

But in addition to that, they have encouraged people to build on that platform using their own ideas: new Apps which meet Apple's technical standards can then be eligible to join the growing App family, however weird or useless or useful they might be.

I am not a great App downloader. I shy away from addictive e-games, and most of the Utility apps do not do much more for me than what I can do anyway. The apps for finding one's car in a vast Heathrow car-park are not yet (it seems, according to the reviews) quite accurate enough.

That said, BizExpense by Anishu is excellent. It allows me to tap all my expenses into the iPhone as they crop up (I can customise my own categories) and then email the lot to myself or someone else when the journey concerned is over. I can even take iPhone photos of the receipts and email them as attachments. A huge saving of time and messing about.

Plus I have been in touch with Anishu to suggest some refinements, and had nice replies. All in all, a superb, liberating and profoundly democratic and efficient Amazon Space (iPhone Space?) experience, based on the ultimate core of all market forces - human creativity.

At my talk last week to Conservative Friends of Poland I used the iPhone as a metaphor for a new vision of Conservatism. I argued that the madness of the New Labour project with its obsession with state meddling and control would have to give way to something lighter and better.

We do not know what education and health needs we are going to have, and how best to meet them. The task is now of a complexity far exceeding the capacity of politicians and bureaucrats to master it. Their ever more feverishly clever attempts to create order from uncertainty based on old ways of doing things are farcical.

So why not instead for education simply lay down some solid foundations (a two-page guide on core standards for running schools, plus a side or two for each subject describing the levels needed to be reached at GCSE and A-Level), then let all schools just get on with it?

This approach would get far away from the current obsession with targets by simply dropping the whole idea of targets. It would incentivise intelligent networked experimentation and managing the unexpected. It would bring to the fore at a huge pace the best educational ideas we can all come up with. The huge sums of money saved from slashing bureaucracy could be used to reward positive outcomes and boost teachers pay.

Having established the principle in education, similar ideas could be rolled out across all areas of government.

So here are my slogans for winning the next general election:

Put Labour out of Gordon's misery - and ours!

Set our people free!

Design your apps - design your lives!

And the whole campaign itself could encourage witty anti-Labour apps and be run via iPhones and other cool mobiles.

Bring it on.


Older comments:
28th September 2009
Joe
The thing about the few iPhone applications I've been shown by fans is that they always strike me as either absurdly niche or just plain duplication...do I really need a phone that's also a spirit level? Nonetheless, they are as you point out Charles, a tribute to man's creativity and ingenuity, if not exactly his commercial skill. The more weird and wonderful the applications people design: the more iPhone units Apple sells.

And although I would love to see UK education stripped of the numerous quangos and parasites who feed off it, the teaching profession itself is so heavily politicised, even as radical a change as you suggest would only worsen the disease. Have a look at this little video from TeachMeet which is actually very like the network of experimentation you imagine. When professional teachers produce work as trite, transparent and childish as this, I honestly don't know where to turn.
http://www.teachmeet.org.uk/
29th September 2009
shane dillon
Your lauding of Apple iphone Apps as a template for Britain is quite interesting. Apple at its core is centralising, you have to submit apps to them for their approval.  They control at the centre which apps go forth so much for freedom and creativity.  Of course Apple have form they clung onto DRM until the death so they could stop consumers sharing what they bought from them in the first place.

As for the state I feel glad to have one as who else could clean up the mess left by private banks living the free market fantasy to the hilt.
29th September 2009
james higham
I'm so far out of these things.  I have a phone and that's it.
29th September 2009
Charles Crawford

There are of course solid liberty issues about the fact that Apple has such a tight grip over iTunes content. But then at least we can opt out of iTunes, whereas we can't opt out of the State quite so easily.

My basic idea was that as things stand we have a massively centralised cumbersome State which suppresses innovation in taxpayer-funded processes and makes many things obviously worse. Why not instead move from Targets to Standards, slash back on centralised process and then let experimentation have a try?

As for the argument that the state has come to our rescue and saved us from all those greedy bankers, pshaw. The state is not a kindly uncle who now and again opens his piggy bank to help out his poor relatives when they have got themselves in a muddle. The state creates huge problems by nationalising the creation and emission of money, then to try to resolve those problems takes wealth by force either from us or from our children. Is that the sort of rescuer we want? No. 

  Home  |  Mediator  |  Speaker  |  Speechwriter  |  About  |  FAQs  |  Contact  |  Well-Armed Red Riding Hood  |  Amazon Space  |  Terms and Conditions  |  About RSS  |  Writing  |  Websites  |  badger  
For hire

Engage Charles Crawford as

 

website design by oxford web