More hi-octane prose from (of course) Camille Paglia bearing down on Hillary Clinton and her prospects.

Questions.

Camille says this :

Furthermore, Hillary’s mythomania and her chameleon-like daily alterations of persona and voice are unsettling. (Even Hillary’s eye colour is fake: she wears blue contact lenses.) No male candidate enjoys Hillary’s options as a woman to tailor her costume to the audience.

Is this true?

Would it be better for them (and for us?) if men running for office did have a full ‘womanly’ range of such colour-coded options?

And does it really help Hillary to have such options if she apparently uses them in a contrived way?

Would the consistently classic and classy look of Condoleezza Rice be more persuasive for men and women voters alike? 

(OK OK, Condi too sometimes makes some unexpected fashion statements.)